# Discover an Effective Method to Derive Vector Identities
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Vector Identities
Are you among those who struggle to memorize complex vector identities, like the distinctions between bac-cab and cab-bac? I definitely find it challenging! Fortunately, there's a clever method to derive these identities seamlessly. If you think this trick is tough, attempt to solve one of these identities using a different method and you might just change your perspective.
To grasp this technique, let's meet Mr. Kronecker and Mr. Levi-Civita.
Section 1.1: The Kronecker and Levi-Civita Symbols
Two essential symbols can significantly simplify your work: the Kronecker symbol and the Levi-Civita symbol.
For example, consider the following representation of these symbols. They allow for a more concise notation of vector identities. The Kronecker symbol is particularly useful for simplifying multiple sums. For instance, the symbol in a double sum can eliminate one of the sums since all terms involving it will equal zero.
On the other hand, the Levi-Civita symbol can be used to express vector products. The component of the vector product ( mathbf{A} times mathbf{B} ) can be defined using these symbols, with both indices ranging from 1 to 3. Doesn't this make things easier? Just wait, it gets better!
Section 1.2: A Key Formula
Before we dive into practical applications, there’s one crucial formula to remember. It connects the Kronecker symbol with the Levi-Civita symbol:
This relationship is so beneficial that it’s worth committing to memory. Now, we’re ready to put these symbols to use!
Chapter 2: Applying the Symbols in Practice
As our first example, let’s examine the well-known identity for the following expression:
To express the vector products using the Levi-Civita symbol, simply write it out in terms of these symbols. Don’t be intimidated by the complex sums; focus on the structure of the indices. By comparing with the double-epsilon formula, we see that the summation index is the third one. Thus, we can swap the indices in the second epsilon, yielding a negative factor.
Now, we can utilize our handy formula. All symbols in the sum are just numbers, so we can manipulate them like regular arithmetic. By expanding the parentheses, factoring in the negative sign, and rearranging, we reach a new point.
We can now collapse the sums. In the first sum, replace each index appropriately, and in the second sum, do the same. This gives us a new expression that only includes scalar products.
Look at the resulting sums—they consist solely of scalar products! Hence, we can write:
This represents the (i)-th component of the identity we are exploring. Since (i) can be any index, we derive:
Initially, this method might seem complicated, but with practice, it becomes intuitive and can be applied effortlessly, especially for more complex identities.
As a second illustration, let’s compute:
First, convert the scalar product into index notation, and then express the vector products similarly. Again, don’t worry about the complicated sums. This time, the summation indices are already aligned correctly, allowing us to substitute them with deltas.
Next, we can collapse the sums once more. After rearranging, we recognize the expressions as scalar products.
Isn’t this a powerful technique? Why not give it a try yourself? How about tackling:
This last expression involves a nine-fold sum, and it remains straightforward! Solutions can be found on the supplementary page of this article.
Thanks for your attention! If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to share your thoughts.