Understanding the Impact of Jane Elliott’s Eye Color Experiment
Written on
Chapter 1: The Experiment Unfolds
In the wake of Martin Luther King Jr.'s assassination, a pivotal incident occurred at a rural Iowa elementary school. Jane Elliott, a third-grade teacher, implemented an unusual lesson aimed at illustrating the impact of racism. She informed her all-white class that students with brown eyes were superior and therefore deserved preferential treatment. Consequently, she assigned the brown-eyed children the best seats in the classroom while relegating their blue-eyed peers to the back, granting them additional recess time.
The blue-eyed students were not only isolated in seating but also prohibited from using the water fountain, being required to drink from paper cups instead. To further distinguish them, they were instructed to wear scarves around their necks.
The Results Were Astonishing
The previously united classroom atmosphere quickly dissipated. The blue-eyed children faced harsh treatment, with some classmates openly ridiculing them. This shift in behavior led to a noticeable decline in the performance of blue-eyed students, who struggled with their assignments, a stark contrast to their usual ease.
The following day brought an unexpected twist. Jane revealed to the class that she had fabricated the previous day's claims. She proclaimed that the brown-eyed children were not superior; instead, it was the blue-eyed students who held that distinction. Once again, the dynamics of the class shifted, mirroring the previous day's aggression but with less hostility directed towards the brown-eyed students.
"If it can be learned, it can be unlearned," - Jane Elliott
A Lesson for Life
At the conclusion of the two-day exercise, Jane posed a critical question to her students: Is it right to discriminate based on color? Through this thought-provoking experience, she effectively imparted a lesson about racism that remains one of the most debated psychological experiments to this day.
Even decades later, participants reflect on the profound insights they gained from this exercise.
Key Takeaway
The methodology of Elliott's experiment has sparked considerable debate among experts. Some argue that without a solid framework, the potential risks may overshadow the benefits. Conversely, others maintain that with proper debriefing, the educational value outweighs any emotional discomfort experienced by the students.
According to a comprehensive study conducted by the Centre for Social Change & Social Equity at Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, titled "Anti-Racism — What Works? An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Anti-Racism Strategies," it was noted:
"When implementing anti-racism strategies, it is crucial to consider the broader context. The strategies suitable for 1930 differ from those in 1960, and again from the 1990s. The strategies needed post-September 11 and post-October 12 have also evolved."
Furthermore, the report highlighted that the challenges tied to racism in one era may not align with those in another. It emphasized that the nature of racism is not static and evolves over time and context, necessitating patience and structural change for effective social transformation.
Chapter 2: The Lasting Impact of the Experiment
The first video, "Elton John - Blue Eyes," explores themes of perception and emotional depth, paralleling the lessons learned from Elliott's experiment.
The second video, "Blue Eyes (Remastered)," revisits the nuances of visual representation, echoing the need for understanding beyond surface appearances.