Social Media Driver Licenses: A Necessary Step for Accountability
Written on
The Case for Social Media Driver Licenses
It's time to consider using our real names online.
In the words of rapper Macklemore from his 2012 hit "Same Love," social media has not improved much. The negativity and hostility present in comments sections are a daily occurrence. Not only do we still see hate speech, but platforms also amplify misinformation, ranging from conspiracy theories about elections to harmful content about mental health on sites like Reddit.
These platforms have little motivation to regulate this content; policing speech often leads to lost revenue, as incendiary comments drive engagement. Users are more likely to click when provoked.
While many express the desire for social media companies to take stronger action, few would agree that platforms like Facebook (now Meta) should act as the arbiters of truth, nor do we want the government filling that role.
So what is the solution?
Introducing a Social Media Driver License system could be the answer. Just as you need a driver's license to operate a vehicle on public roads, one should be required to post or comment publicly on social media. This could involve restrictions based on age, past behavior, and other factors. For instance, the appropriate age for children to engage in social media could be regulated similarly to existing laws on driving or drinking.
Imagine if users had to comment on platforms like YouTube using their real names; it might deter them from making inflammatory remarks. Their identities would be known to friends, family, and employers, thereby fostering a more respectful online environment. While some negativity will persist, the visibility of real identities would likely encourage better behavior among the majority of users.
Some argue that this could infringe on free speech and raise security and privacy concerns. However, requiring real names does not limit the content of one's comments. If an individual feels uneasy about associating their opinion with their true identity, they might need to reconsider whether they should voice that opinion at all. Furthermore, this requirement does not expose sensitive personal information like home addresses or email accounts, which are already publicly accessible through various channels.
There could be exceptions for artists who wish to maintain anonymity for their creative works on platforms like Medium, but these should be strictly limited to avoid undermining the overarching rule.
The Importance of Knowing Your User
Most financial institutions operate under "Know Your Customer" (KYC) regulations to prevent illicit activities like money laundering and drug trafficking. While not foolproof, these measures help maintain the integrity of the financial system.
Social media companies should adopt a similar approach. The goal would be to improve the incentive structures online and reduce the spread of harmful, misleading information. By requiring social media platforms to "Know Your User," they would be compelled to shine a light on the darker aspects of online discourse and hold users accountable.
Lessons from Facebook
Facebook has implemented a real-name policy for years. Although it has not completely eradicated hate speech, it has made it easier to identify problematic users. However, many evade this requirement by disseminating harmful content through Facebook Pages or Groups. These loopholes undermine the effectiveness of the proposed social media driver license system. Transparency about who is behind these communities is essential.
Despite its efforts, Facebook has faced challenges with its real-name policy, particularly from marginalized groups who have unique or long names. While the platform has improved its approval process, issues remain for any social media service considering a similar policy.
Addressing Safety and Privacy Concerns
Critics often argue that requiring real names would make it easier for identity thieves and hackers to exploit users. They might liken this proposal to authoritarian practices seen in places like China.
However, this initiative would not be government-enforced. Major social media platforms would need to comply with these requirements, similar to how regulations have been introduced to curb the excesses of unregulated capitalism. Misinformation spreads rapidly online, and social media companies serve as gatekeepers who must understand their users.
Skeptics may point out that databases containing real names could be targets for hackers, as seen in past incidents in South Korea. Nonetheless, this proposal relies on existing infrastructure within established tech companies, which already manage vast amounts of personal data.
Safety and privacy concerns also work in the opposite direction; when individuals can hide behind fake identities, they may feel emboldened to engage in bullying and harassment. For example, after a controversial incident in Formula 1, driver Nicholas Latifi received death threats via social media, highlighting the dangers of anonymity online.
Moreover, in services like Uber and Lyft, the lack of identity verification can lead to dangerous situations. Passengers can create accounts under false names, making it easier for criminals to misuse the platform.
While social media platforms may not require the same level of scrutiny, implementing a social media driver license would enhance overall online safety. Individuals making threats or engaging in harmful behavior would be easily identifiable.
Reevaluating Free Speech
One major concern regarding the real-name policy is its potential to restrict free speech. Some argue that individuals may hesitate to express their views if their identities are attached to their comments.
If you find yourself feeling this way, it may be worth considering why. Is it fear of professional repercussions? Concern over judgment from peers? If so, it’s essential to reflect on the motives behind your posts or comments.
As mentioned previously, exceptions for artistic expression should be allowed. However, in the fast-paced environments of platforms like Twitter and Reddit, where harmful content spreads quickly, requiring real names for comments is critical. If someone wishes to publish a controversial book, they should feel free to do so—just don’t expect anonymity.
A New Approach to Censorship
Western democracies, especially the United States, are grappling with the challenges of managing hate speech and misinformation online. We should not designate any entity, be it Twitter or an individual, as the ultimate authority on truth. While promoting freedom of speech is crucial, we must also recognize that these rights have reasonable limitations.
Instead of trying to define "truth" in an impossible quest, we could implement social media driver licenses. This would compel social media platforms to "Know Your User" and ensure that users are accountable for their contributions.
Implementing such measures could significantly improve online discourse, reducing the need to debate who should control online censorship. The risks posed to victims of cyberbullying, hate speech, and threats far outweigh the potential downsides of requiring real identities. Identity thieves already have ample information at their disposal, and we must take action to combat the proliferation of misinformation and disinformation online. Social media driver licenses could be a meaningful first step.
For more insights from Logan Stone, subscribe to his newsletter, PolisPandit, where he discusses the interplay of money, power, and technology.
A discussion on the rights and regulations surrounding driver’s licenses in the U.S. and their implications.
An update on current issues related to driver’s licenses and their relevance to social media identity verification.