Understanding and Overcoming Gradient Descent Challenges
Written on
# Introduction to Gradient Descent Challenges
Vanishing and exploding gradients are significant issues encountered while training models based on deep neural networks. These problems contribute to instability and hinder the learning capabilities of multilayer models on specific datasets. This article delves into identifying and addressing these challenges.
# What is Gradient Descent?
Gradient descent serves as a crucial optimization method for training neural networks and machine learning models. The training process involves two main actions: feeding the training data into the network (feedforward propagation) and subsequently updating the model parameters (weights and biases) through backpropagation. The input data enables the models to learn, while the loss function acts as a metric for accuracy during parameter updates. The model iteratively adjusts its parameters to minimize errors, striving for a loss function value that approaches zero. Below is an illustration of a neural network comprising three hidden layers:
# Types of Gradient Descent
The following figure illustrates the three primary optimization algorithms associated with gradient descent:
# Challenges Faced by Gradient Descent
Despite being the most prevalent method for optimization, gradient descent faces several challenges, including:
Difficulty in Identifying Global Minimum in Nonconvex Problems: The model may halt learning when it becomes trapped in local minima during nonconvex scenarios. Various alternatives exist to mitigate this issue, with Adam being the most widely used optimizer.
Vanishing and Exploding Gradient Issues: These problems contribute to the erratic behavior of deep neural networks. The vanishing gradient issue can result in poor performance in deep models, leading to premature convergence on suboptimal solutions. Conversely, exploding gradients can cause numerical overflows or underflows, yielding non-updatable NaN values.
# Identifying the Vanishing Gradient Problem
The term "vanishing gradient" pertains to the phenomenon where the backpropagated error signal tends to decrease (or increase) exponentially as it moves away from the final layer in a feedforward network (FFN). This article will use a binary classification example to explore the vanishing gradient problem, showcasing a dataset composed of two noisy circles with a seed value of 1 for the pseudorandom number generator.
Typically, adjusting the depth of a neural network can influence the model's capacity. A shallow model may underfit, while a deeper model risks overfitting or getting lost during optimization. Increasing the number of layers can also exacerbate the vanishing gradient issue. In this article, we will examine a deeper model featuring four hidden layers to observe each layer's response to training. For experimental purposes, the article utilizes a helper function to configure the neural network model.
By experimenting with various activation functions and initializers, one can effectively compare different models using make_mlp_model. Initially, the sigmoid activation function is employed in the hidden layers, coupled with RandomNormal weight initialization to recreate the vanishing gradient scenario.
The model architecture is illustrated as follows:
The article implements a helper function that manually executes the training loop and retains a record of the gradients to illustrate the relationship between the activation function and the gradient:
Using this helper function, we can document and visualize the gradient and loss throughout the model's training, as shown below:
The preceding figure indicates that the loss remains relatively high when employing the sigmoid activation function. Moreover, the mean gradient (the average of all elements within the gradient matrix) displays a significant value solely for the output layer, while the gradients in other layers are nearly zero. This exemplifies how the vanishing gradient problem can lead to minimal or no improvement in model training, potentially resulting in premature convergence.
# Strategies to Mitigate the Vanishing Gradient Issue
To alleviate the effects of vanishing gradients, several techniques are commonly employed:
- Utilizing various activation functions
- Implementing different weight initialization methods
- Experimenting with different optimizers and learning rates
Utilizing Various Activation Functions
Incorporating activation functions into deep neural networks introduces non-linearity into the model architecture, allowing models to comprehend and learn from datasets that linear models may struggle with. The gradient of the loss function is computed, and model parameters are iteratively updated during training. This process adheres to a chain rule where the gradient of the activation function plays a crucial role. Consequently, if the gradient of an activation function is minimal, following the chain rule can lead to gradient vanishing.
The figure below compares various activation functions along with their gradients:
The subsequent figure illustrates the loss and mean gradient for different activation functions:
As illustrated, using ReLU as the activation function results in a more variable mean gradient across all layers, contrasting with the Sigmoid function, which shows a non-zero gradient only in the final layer. Additionally, the loss significantly declines in the ReLU case compared to Sigmoid.
Implementing Different Weight Initialization Methods
Initial weights are equally vital. If the initial weights are excessively small or lack variance, they can lead to gradient vanishing, as highlighted by Xavier Glorot and Yoshua Bengio in their 2010 study. The figure below demonstrates the impact of different initializers on model training.
Experimenting with Optimizers and Learning Rates
After addressing derivatives and initial weight selection, the final step is optimizing the learning rate and selecting appropriate optimizers.
# Identifying the Exploding Gradient Problem
The exploding gradient issue arises from the initial weights assigned to the neural network, leading to substantial losses. Large gradient values can accumulate, resulting in excessive parameter updates that cause gradient descents to fluctuate without reaching a global minimum. In extreme cases, these parameters may become excessively large, overflowing and producing NaN values that are non-updatable.
The following example utilizes a dummy dataset generated with the sklearn library to illustrate the exploding gradient issue:
For this problem, we again employ a deeper model, this time featuring five hidden layers to examine each layer's training response. A similar helper function as previously mentioned is utilized to set up the neural network model. The architecture of the model is as follows:
By employing the aforementioned helper function, we can now capture and visualize the gradient and loss during the training phase, as shown below:
The preceding figure is blank due to an explosion in the gradient, resulting in a gradhistory containing NaN values. This scenario utilizes ReLU as the activation function with the he_uniform weight initializer and SGD optimizer.
# Strategies to Mitigate the Exploding Gradient Issue
To lessen the impact of exploding gradients, the following strategies can be employed:
- Implementing gradient clipping
- Utilizing different weight initialization schemes
Implementing Gradient Clipping
Gradient clipping is a highly effective approach to prevent gradient explosion issues. It constrains the derivatives to a specified threshold, using the capped gradients for weight updates throughout the network. The figure below illustrates three scenarios:
The clipnorm parameter can also be adjusted within the optimizer to manage exploding gradient problems.
Utilizing Different Weight Initialization Methods
Large weight initialization can often lead to gradient explosions, necessitating proper initialization techniques to mitigate this issue. The figure below presents three scenarios:
In addition to careful weight initialization, techniques such as L2 regularization can offer substantial benefits. L2 regularization applies a penalty on large weight values by incorporating a squared term of the model weights into the loss function.
That's all for now.
I hope you found this article insightful. If you have any questions or if something was overlooked, feel free to connect with me on LinkedIn or Twitter.
Further Reading: - How to Ace Hyperparameter Optimization - How to Ace Exploratory Data Analysis - How to Ace Data Visualization - How to Manage Imbalanced Datasets
Cheers!
Rahul