The Illusion of Private Equity: A Closer Look at Profits and Pitfalls
Written on
Chapter 1: Understanding Private Equity
Private equity (PE) firms often present a facade of value creation while primarily serving the interests of the wealthy and influential.
In 2022, Blackstone CEO Steve Schwarzman earned nearly a billion dollars, a staggering amount that raises questions about the source of such wealth. Is it the result of generating genuine value? Not necessarily. Many of my institutional investor clients allocate substantial resources into private equity, prompting extensive discussions on the associated risks and potential benefits. My previous employment with a firm that was acquired by a PE company allowed me to witness firsthand the cost-cutting measures and profit-driven strategies that often disregard the workforce's needs.
Section 1.1: The Mechanics of Profit in PE
PE firms primarily profit by converting public companies into private entities. The idea is to enhance these companies' efficiency and productivity, allowing the PE firm to reap rewards upon either re-listing the company or selling it at a premium.
However, the reality is that PE firms often target financially stable companies with minimal debt, as these firms have a strong borrowing capacity. This financial leverage is used to cover a substantial portion of the acquisition cost—much like securing a mortgage for a home. While a homeowner is liable for their mortgage, a PE firm leverages the acquired company's cash flows and assets as collateral. This arrangement provides a significant safety net for the PE firm, allowing them to minimize losses if the investment falters. They can walk away largely unscathed, suffering only on the equity they initially invested.
The first video titled "THE PRIVATE EQUITY PLAYBOOK: MAKING BILLIONS FROM BUYING BUSINESSES" delves into how PE firms operate and profit from their acquisitions, often at the expense of the companies' employees.
Section 1.2: Misconceptions About Private Equity's Role
Some financial theorists argue that the private equity sector has two main roles: stabilizing the market by acquiring undervalued firms and revitalizing underperforming companies. However, this notion is misleading.
Imagine you are a managing partner at a PE firm. You have two paths to choose from:
- Devote years to enhancing portfolio companies, gradually improving profitability, and eventually aiming for an IPO.
- Invest a small amount of equity while incurring significant debt to seize control of a company. The majority of its assets are sold off to service this debt, providing immediate dividends to you and your investors.
Clearly, the second option is more attractive, promising quicker returns. This competitive pressure compels PE firms to adopt such strategies, often leading to detrimental outcomes for employees at these companies.
Chapter 2: The Mirage of Diversification
PE investments enjoy popularity, partly due to the long period of low interest rates which made capital more accessible. Additionally, past performance in the 90s and early 2000s has created a hindsight bias favoring PE funds.
Yet, a significant allure stems from an accounting anomaly. Unlike public companies, private firms lack market pricing, making valuations opaque. In contrast to venture capital (VC), where companies undergo regular revaluation, PE firms rely on "independent" assessments from consulting firms like Deloitte or KPMG. However, these valuations often lean in favor of the PE firms, leading to a disconnect between perceived and actual value.
The second video titled "The Private Equity Pitch" discusses how PE firms present themselves to potential investors, emphasizing the perceived security and profitability of their investments.
As a result, when public markets falter, PE firms may resist adjusting their valuations downward, citing temporary fluctuations. This behavior distorts risk perceptions, making private equity appear more stable compared to volatile public markets.
In conclusion, this cycle perpetuates the trend where PE firms continue to extract value from public companies—often with little regard for employee welfare—while institutional investors remain captivated by the illusion of diversification and safety that PE investments seem to promise.