Exploring Sir Francis Bacon's Insights on the Corona Virus
Written on
Chapter 1: The Information Overload
The ongoing discourse around the Corona virus and its impact on the global stock market, alongside responses from politicians and lawmakers, is inescapable. Every moment, we are bombarded with a plethora of information and opinions, often accompanied by questionable guidance from those in power. This leads us to ponder — how can we discern what is genuine?
Sir Francis Bacon argued that humans possess the capacity to interpret any observation, hence we must also critically evaluate everything before accepting it as truth. A notable saying attributed to him is, “Man tends to accept what he wishes were true.” Bacon’s framework for Inductive reasoning begins with specific observations and details, which are then used to formulate a broader theory. This methodology serves as a cornerstone of contemporary scientific thought, contrasting with Deductive reasoning, which starts from established general principles to arrive at specific conclusions.
If Bacon were to analyze the Covid-19 crisis, he would likely adopt a bottom-up perspective. He would focus on the particulars — the who, why, when, and what — using this information to construct models that explain the broader phenomenon.
Chapter 2: Bacon's Idols of the Mind
In his work "Novum Organum," translated as ‘True Directions concerning the Interpretation of Nature,’ Bacon identifies four idols of the mind that can mislead us in our quest for truth.
Section 2.1: Idols of the Tribe
These are inherent beliefs that reside within our collective psyche. Many of these beliefs can be misleading, as they stem from repeated assertions that we eventually accept as truth. For instance, the notion that wearing a face mask offers absolute protection against the virus is not entirely reliable; certain viruses can penetrate masks, and transmission may also occur through the eyes.
Section 2.2: Idols of the Cave
These beliefs are personal and arise from an individual’s unique experiences. If someone in a position of authority subscribes to these beliefs, they may impose them on others. An example could be the assertion that "Covid-19 is merely another flu; while some may die, most will survive, so we should just move on."
Section 2.3: Idols of the Market
This refers to the interpretations of words and phrases that arise from human interactions related to commerce and partnerships. Such terms can be ambiguous and subject to various interpretations. For example, the phrase “Monetary policy is being applied to a medical emergency” suggests that traditional strategies to stabilize the market may be ineffective unless the underlying health crisis is addressed.
Section 2.4: Idols of the Theater
These are the beliefs that are propagated within certain domains, based on fabricated narratives and unfounded logic. The spread of misinformation related to the virus — from conspiracy theories to unverified home remedies — can lead individuals to adopt false beliefs. In the current landscape of social media, these narratives can rapidly gain traction.
Bacon, however, proposed a remedy for these misconceptions. He advocated for the collection of empirical evidence — information derived from observation and experimentation. This skeptical approach fosters a scientific methodology that can yield valuable insights into a given situation.
In the words of renowned scientist Neil deGrasse Tyson, “The great thing about science is that it remains true regardless of personal belief.” The global effort to gather empirical evidence about the virus, coupled with constructive discussions among the scientific community, can lead us to a solution. Humanity has overcome other viral challenges, and we will prevail against this one as well.
To echo Neil deGrasse Tyson’s sentiment, “We ought to heed the voices of scientists.”