Defining Stupidity

One might first consider defining stupid individuals as those with a low Intelligence Quotient (IQ), a metric that assesses reasoning, logical deduction, abstract thinking, and linguistic abilities compared to their peers. An IQ of around 100 indicates average intelligence, but this measure is often criticized for its limitations. It fails to account for emotional intelligence (EQ), practical skills, or common sense.

In 1976, Italian scholar Carlo Cipolla offered an alternative definition: “A stupid person is someone who inflicts losses on others while gaining nothing and possibly suffering losses themselves.” This perspective is thought-provoking, yet it raises questions about the motivations of intelligent individuals who might act destructively for personal amusement or ideological reasons. The adage "there's a thin line between genius and madness" resonates here.

Another viewpoint on stupidity involves individuals who act foolishly due to ignorance, greed, or other misguided motives, as well as those who may simply lack intelligence. A truly foolish person tends to oversimplify complex issues, presenting them as either overly simplistic or unnecessarily complicated. As Einstein suggested, “smart people simplify,” as they understand concepts well enough to communicate them effectively to others. Conversely, a foolish person may misrepresent issues to exploit others' naivety or demonstrate their own lack of comprehension, leading to a distorted understanding of the world.

The Mathematics of Stupidity

Now, let’s examine the mathematics of this phenomenon. Consider two individuals: one intelligent and the other not. Each has a theory on a given topic and aims to persuade others of their viewpoint. The less intelligent individual will often present their theory in an oversimplified manner, allowing for quicker comprehension among the audience. Their lack of nuanced understanding means their argument lacks depth.

In contrast, the intelligent individual recognizes that complex issues require thorough explanation. While they articulate their theory with all its intricacies, this process takes significantly longer. Consequently, the audience's belief in the simplistic theory expands at a rapid pace, outstripping the understanding of the more complex one.

The first video, "The Truth Why Stupid People Think They're Smart," explores the cognitive biases that lead some individuals to overestimate their intelligence, illustrating how this affects their interactions with others.

Continuing this analysis, as the less intelligent theory gains traction, the intelligent theory struggles to expand its audience. The former grows exponentially, while the latter’s growth is linear and eventually stalls.

The second video, "Why Do Stupid People Think They're Smart? The Dunning-Kruger Effect (animated)," offers insight into the Dunning-Kruger effect, demonstrating how individuals with limited knowledge often fail to recognize their own incompetence.

Consequences of Complexity

In the subsequent phase, the simplistic theory can only endure through increasingly convoluted solutions to problems, as proponents become entrenched in their beliefs without questioning their foundations. A sound theory simplifies challenges and has a solid base, rendering it more effective. Although fewer in number, the adherents of the intelligent theory are more capable since it provides real solutions, even if they are often dismissed as misguided by the majority.

The term "theory" here can also refer to arguments, inventions, or moral principles. The function of stupidity operates by taking a straightforward concept, denoting it as 'x', and producing a complex outcome, denoted as f(x). In contrast, intelligence functions by taking a complex concept, also 'x', and producing a simplified outcome, noted as g(x).

When we evaluate not the number of followers for each theory but their effectiveness, the disparity becomes evident.

Ultimately, it appears that the less intelligent do not truly "win." Instead, intelligent individuals often feel compelled to compromise their principles to gain acceptance. This phenomenon can contribute to isolation among thoughtful individuals. Such dynamics may explain the persistence of issues like racism and sexism, as well as the rise of figures who propagate simplistic arguments that gain popularity due to their lack of nuance.

In closing, reflect on your own understanding: do you consider yourself foolish? Thank you for engaging with this exploration. If you found value in it, please share your thoughts and feedback!

References:

• Why the Unfortunate Rise of the Unwise: An Analysis