Basic: Learning

Basic is fundamentally about learning. This language is designed for beginners, yet it is also utilized in professional environments, proving its versatility.

C: Iron

C is like iron—durable yet simple. While it's seen as somewhat primitive, it continues to evolve. If you can think in "C," it offers remarkable performance.

C++: Steel

C++ can be compared to steel. This language enhances C with object-oriented programming, allowing for the management of larger projects. However, careful planning of the class hierarchy is crucial, as mistakes can jeopardize an entire project.

Java: Promise

Java represents a promise—specifically, the idea of "write once, run anywhere." Although this promise has seen partial fulfillment, the emergence of new languages sharing its VM and bytecode capabilities has added to the complexity.

C#: Chameleon

C# is akin to a chameleon. It draws inspiration from C++ while mirroring Java, allowing it to function in various programming styles, from structured to object-oriented and even functional programming.

Assembler: Obsessive

Assembler programming can feel obsessive, as it often requires meticulous attention to performance. It is typically a last resort when other languages fail to meet execution speed demands. While it has its place in microsystems, it is not my primary focus.

Pascal: Elegance

Pascal embodies elegance. Although I could also describe it as "demanding," this language, along with its derivatives like Object Pascal and Delphi, is notable for its structured approach.

DBase: Simplicity

DBase represents simplicity. This vintage database system enabled straightforward data manipulation, paving the way for its successors like Clipper and FoxBase/FoxPro.

LOGO: Easy

LOGO is synonymous with ease. Its simplicity makes it an excellent introductory language for programming. While Scratch exists, I see it as a distinct entity rather than a programming language.

SQL: Immature

SQL is considered immature. Although not a general-purpose language, its many variations lead to incompatibility among manufacturers, highlighting the need for a standardized approach.

COBOL: Immortal

COBOL is immortal. Despite the obsolescence of some programs, the adage "if it works, don’t touch it" holds true, ensuring its continued relevance in niche applications.

PERL: Mucho

PERL is described as "mucho," similar to a mixed-breed dog, reflecting its eclectic features.

Python: Flexible

Python is flexible, akin to C#. Its interpreted nature may limit performance, but it raises the question: is performance always the priority?

LISP: Confused

LISP can seem confusing, particularly to those new to it. While it excels in list manipulation, the complexity of its syntax may deter some users.

JavaScript: Rehash

JavaScript is a rehash of ideas from other languages. Its evolution has led to numerous frameworks, creating a multifaceted language that can seem like many different languages rolled into one.

I want to reiterate that these views are subjective. I welcome differing opinions, and anyone who disagrees is encouraged to share their thoughts in their own articles.

For more insights, check out PlainEnglish.io. Join our free weekly newsletter and follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn. Connect with our community on Discord.